A friend from the doctors' blog Sermo, whose denizens are mostly (but not all) rightie and libertarian sorts, and many of whom I count as friends regardless, ran across this blog and asked me if I was keeping it a secret. I haven't, and I welcome all who want to come here. If you read back, and find things you disagree with, feel free to let fly; I'll respond. But I've an odd reservation, as I replied to him thus (crossposted from the Sermo 'private' messaging board:
My screen name comes from my eldest daughter, who loves wombats after
seeing 'em on an Animal Planet show when she was little. She'd ask me a
question, and I'd usually respond, 'That's complicated', and go down to
the basement library and come up with five books. So, she called me
'Prof. Complicated'. I merged the two out of my love for her, and to
remind myself not to take myself too seriously. Works well, doesn't
it? (dives into blast shelter)
Thanks so much--I've let the blog lapse and thanks for reminding me
of it; I'll start posting on it again. I hadn't spread the news far and
wide about it because the stuff i wrote for it i did mostly in a
vacuum, which means I didn't get feedback from those with whom I
disagree, but want to maintain a conversation with anyway. There are a
couple of people on Sermo like that... So, some of the political posts
aren't all that temperate and reasoned on the blog, more like venting my
spleen than debating with intelligent people using facts and logic.
I don't hide my views under a rock here 'zackly. But neither do I
let fly with all cannons firing with respect to how I feel about that
stuff. It's pretty obvious, I'd guess, that I feel deeply about
it--wouldn't keep it up otherwise. And I've said most of what I've said
anywhere else here, too. But neither do I want to offend, or make it
impossible to keep the conversation up. My goals here are to make room
for the notion that one can be human and sane and be left of center
anyway, to the extent that mutual respect in disagreement is possible,
that one can disagree without dismissing someone else's common humanity,
the possibility that despite our disagreements we could work together
to find enough common ground to move the case along. That's harder
sometimes than just letting the rhetorical flag fly marching into
battle. Less fun sometimes. Requires restraint and forethought on my
part. And also, harder because I don't want to compromise my views in
doing so: that would be hypocrisy in service of the illusion of
community, and would vitiate the whole exercise. I'm the first to admit
that I don't always get it right, but I try.
I love sharing all the non-political stuff, always, and love talking
with people who don't think the way I do because I learn something from
them, every time. So anyone who comes to the blog is always welcome,
not a secret, Kumbaya and like that. I just don't want people to come
there expecting reasoned dialogue and finding what they might see as
partisan diatribe, getting turned off and ending the conversation. If
they have comments in disagreement, I'll answer them the way I do here,
semicolons and all, and I'd hope that'd be OK. Hope all that makes
sense.
Long answer to your short question--I do that a lot--with deep respect, and gratitude.
I'll be back here often enough to keep you coming back, assuming the content's at all worth it to you. Go ahead. Teach me something. Make my world bigger. I get stupid if I only talk to myself...
3 comments:
(PAC's post deleted at his/her request for identity concerns--ProfW)
Thanks Professor for sharing your blog.
PAC
my pleasure
Post a Comment